Firefox gbrowser onnewtab3/28/2023 ![]() We change this Privacy Notice from time to time. If there are differences in our policy between products, we'll point them out. In this Privacy Notice, we use the term "Chrome" to refer to all the products in the Chrome family listed above. Details specific to Chrome are provided in this Notice where relevant. If Google Play apps have been enabled on your Chromebook, the use and protection of information collected by Google Play or the Android operating system is governed by the Google Play Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy. Google’s retention policy describes how and why Google retains data. Although this policy describes features that are specific to Chrome, any personal information that is provided to Google or stored in your Google Account will be used and protected in accordance with the Google Privacy Policy, as changed from time to time. This test didn’t evaluate any of those factors, so you’ll have to decide for yourself whether it’s worth making the switch.īut if nothing else, it’s good to know that Chrome isn’t as bad with RAM as I thought - and that Microsoft Edge beats both Chrome and Firefox.Learn how to control the information that's collected, stored, and shared when you use the Google Chrome browser on your computer or mobile device, ChromeOS, and when you enable Safe Browsing in Chrome. A browser should be lightweight, sure, but it should also load your favorite websites without a hitch, run the extensions you want, protect you from malware and so forth. RAM usage will vary somewhat depending on your system, and will vary tremendously depending on what kind of websites you visit, and which extensions you use.ĭoes this make Edge the “best” Web browser? Not necessarily. It’s important to remember that my tests weren’t highly scientific. The difference isn’t night-and-day, particularly if your system has a lot of RAM to play with, but this could be a big deal for lower-powered PCs - especially lightweight laptops. It really is leaner and meaner than either Chrome or Firefox. Microsoft has made a big to-do about Edge being a real contender in the Web-browsing space, and my results suggest that the company isn’t just blowing smoke. These figures are roughly double what the 20-tab test required, which is not terribly surprising - except for Chrome, which seems to be a little bit better about optimizing data across two windows. On the final test, with 40 tabs open across two instances (20 tabs apiece), Edge required 2.5 GB RAM altogether, while Chrome needed 2.8 GB and Firefox needed 3.0 GB. On the other hand, not every user needs 60 tabs open simultaneously, so consider whether this use-case might apply to you. The results here were much starker than the 20-tab test, as Firefox required a whole extra gig of memory, compared to Edge. With the 20-tab test, Chrome performed the weakest, eating up 1.8 GB RAM, compared to Firefox at 1.6 GB and Edge at only 1.4 GB.Įdge continued to perform the best when I loaded 60 tabs in a single browser window, taking up 2.9 GB of RAM, versus 3.7 GB for Chrome and 3.9 GB for Firefox. But to beat Google at its own game is still impressive. That Edge made such a great showing is less surprising when you remember that Microsoft’s browser now runs on the same Chromium architecture as Chrome. The real surprise, however, was Edge, weighing in at only 873 MB of memory. Running 10 tabs took up 952 MB of memory in Chrome, while Firefox took up 995 MB. This replicates a user multitasking - writing in one window, and researching in another, for example. For the final test, I opened up each browser twice, and launched 20 tabs in each instance. ![]() ![]() I opened three copies apiece of each website from the 20-tab test. Next, to really tax each browser I opened a whopping 60 tabs in Chrome, Firefox and Edge. This time around, I kept the initial 10 tabs, then added 10 more from equally demanding sites: eBay, Best Buy, the New York Times, Disney Plus and Google Stadia, to name a few. When a browser has a ton of tabs open, rather than try to run each one simultaneously, it will often prioritize and optimize data in order to save RAM. The second step was to see how each browser handled massive amounts of data. ![]() From there, all I had to do was monitor memory usage in Windows Task Manager. I used Guest profiles in Chrome and Edge, and a “clean” profile in Firefox, in order to prevent extensions or bookmarks from clogging things up. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |